Skip to main content

IPTables Commands

To cause iptables to function as a basic packet filtering firewall, you need these commands:
iptables -F
iptables -N block
iptables -A block -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Obviously, that is the most basic and essential iptables configuration. However, here are some others.

To list the current iptables rules use:
iptables –L
To allow communication on a specific port, SSH port 22 and HTTP port 80 for example use:

iptables –A INPUT –p tcp –dport ssh –j ACCEPT
iptables –A INPUT –p tcp –dport 80 –j ACCEPT
Also there are several flags that can be passed to the iptables command. Below are listed the most common flags and what they do. Several other flags exist but are not listed.
A: Append this rule to a rule chain
-L: List the current filter rules
-p: The connection protocol used
--dport: The destination port required for the rule. A single port can be given or a range.
-i: Only match if the packet is coming in on the specified interface.
-v: Verbose output
-s, --source: address source specification
-d, --destination: address destination specification

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

POC Links for CVE's

  Serach for a CVE here first - Trickest/cve Apache CVE-2024-38475 - CVE-2024-38475 #version less than 2.4.51 CVE-2021-44790 - h ttps://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51193 #Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 CVE-2021-42013 - https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50406 use https://github.com/mrmtwoj/apache-vulnerability-testing for below CVE's CVE-2024-38472: Apache HTTP Server on Windows UNC SSRF CVE-2024-39573: mod_rewrite proxy handler substitution CVE-2024-38477: Crash resulting in Denial of Service in mod_proxy CVE-2024-38476: Exploitable backend application output causing internal redirects CVE-2024-38475: mod_rewrite weakness with filesystem path matching CVE-2024-38474: Weakness with encoded question marks in backreferences CVE-2024-38473: mod_proxy proxy encoding problem CVE-2023-38709: HTTP response splitting EXIM #suppodily should work for versions below Exim 4.96.1 - is not accurate CVE-2023-42115 - https://github.com/AdaHop-Cyber-Security/Pocy/tree/main

Pivoting into an internal network behind firewall

    Accessing a Victim network from Windows box which is pivoted to Kali #On Kali sshuttle --listen 0.0.0.0 -r user@10.10.10.10 192.168.1.0/24 or ./chisel server --port 9001 -reverse #On Victim ./chisel.exe client 10.10.10.1:9001 R:0.0.0.0:1080:socks .\chisel.exe client 10.10.10.1:9001 R:8080:127.0.0.1:8080 R:8888:127.0.0.1:8888 R:9090:127.0.0.1:9090 #On windows route print #delete default route route delete 0.0.0.0 #add a new route to kali- setting kali ip as gateway; kali_ip=which is on the same subnet as the windows box route add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 KALI_IP #Now you should be able to access all the sites which are accessible on kali from windows box. #If the above doesnt work #asuming Kali and windows are on Eht0 #add a firewall rule to allow Kali ip traffic netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Allow VPN Traffic" dir=in action=allow protocol=any remoteip=KALI_ETH0_IP #on Kali - Allow tun0 traffic to forward on iptables sudo iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT ...